Deep Dive Brief: Constellation Software Capital Allocation Outlook - Part I

Can CSU sustain its legendary returns into the next decade?

Nikotes

Aug 21, 2025

∙ Paid

Expanse Stocks x Finchat (now Fiscal AI) Partnership!

🎁 Get 20% off + 2 months free on any plan! →🔗 Claim Discount

Welcome back Explorer!

In this eleventh edition of my Deep Dive Briefs series, I’m continuing my research journey on serial acquirers, this time exploring one of the big whales on the space but using a different approach as you will see inside the topics we’ll cover:

The Inevitable Gravity of Scale

By Nikotes, author of Expanse Stocks

I've been thinking a lot about Constellation Software lately, particularly after their latest results and the ongoing discussions about their long-term reinvestment prospects. The company has delivered one of the most impressive capital allocation track records in public markets, but the central question for the next decade is whether this model can withstand the dual pressures of bigger scale and increased competition.

While CSU's decentralized structure and proven playbook provide a formidable defense, I think it's highly probable that the laws of financial gravity will take hold. The math is pretty straightforward: sustaining 25%+ IRRs on an ever-growing pool of capital becomes exceptionally challenging as you scale. The thing is most investors are still underwriting CSU as if the past will simply continue indefinitely.

Topics We’ll Cover

🔹 The Original CSU Playbook
🔹 The Headwinds
🔹 Strategy Evolution
🔹 Strategic Alternatives for Sustained Returns
🔹 The Risks
🔹 Peer Comparison
🔹 Three IRR Scenarios for the Next Decade (including an IRR model)
🔹 How to Think About CSU Going Forward
🔹 The Bottom Line

This Deep Dive Brief kicks off a three-part series on Constellation Software.
This first chapter will be free and open to all readers, and at the end you’ll also find a downloadable IRR model (exclusive to subscribers).

I hope you enjoy it, let’s get into it!

📰 What’s New at Expanse Stocks?

📊 Quarterly Update - Portfolio Composition (by Industry and Geography) + Valuation Metrics → 🔗 Behind-The-Scenes [Free access]

📚 Articles

💸 General Investing
💎 Hidden Gems Series
✨ Annual Specials – Annual Letters, Investing Philosophy, Industry Write-ups & Top Picks of the Year
📚 Resources for Investors
📢 Latest Stock News
💬 Join My Chat → [📎 Learn more]

🔐 Paid Subscriber Exclusives

💼 Portfolio Corner – Holdings, valuation models, trades, performance & more!
🤫 Exclusive Sections – From select articles, Deep Dive Briefs & Hidden Gems

👀 Recent Releases!

👀 Coming Soon

🔎 Deep Dive Brief: Deconstructing Mercado Libre’s Optionality - Part III
✨ Expanse Stocks 2025 Annual Letter

➕ Unlock Premium Content – For just $0.39/day ($12/month) or $0.27/day ($100/year)!

🔗 Full Portfolio Content - 🗓️ Monthly Updates (Last Update: 28-Oct-2025)

📈 Biweekly Report – Portfolio updates, recent moves & watchlist additions
💼 Full Portfolio Access – Holdings, valuation metrics & performance tracking
📊 Valuation Tools – DCF, reverse DCF, capital efficiency & growth models
🎧 Podcast Picks – Biweekly handpicked episodes on business & investing
🔎 Stock Picking Framework – My methodology & investing philosophy
🎯 Swing Trading – Short-term strategy & latest swing trades
💬 Private Community Chat - 📎 Learn more
🔐 Full access to all my articles

The Original Playbook: A Masterclass in Capital Allocation

Constellation built one of the most successful reinvestment engines in public markets through its disciplined vertical market software (VMS) acquisition strategy. The model is brilliant in its simplicity: acquire small, cash-generative software companies in fragmented verticals from retiring founders, typically paying 1-3x revenue or 3-5x EBITDA for assets with high recurring revenue and switching costs.

The numbers speak for themselves. Management has consistently achieved unlevered IRRs of 20-30% on acquisitions, while maintaining consolidated ROIC above 20%. This high return on invested capital, combined with aggressive reinvestment rates, created the mathematical formula behind their legendary shareholder returns.

The genius of Mark Leonard's approach was recognizing that decentralized execution at scale could maintain small-company acquisition discipline while deploying increasing amounts of capital. Rather than running everything from corporate headquarters, the six operating groups and their underlying business units are empowered to find and execute their own deals, creating a wide and deep deal sourcing network.

But here's the thing: the environment that enabled this success is changing rapidly.

The Headwinds

Deal Flow Is Getting More Competitive

The global VMS market remains highly fragmented with thousands of potential targets (CSU estimates around 70,000 potential acquisitions), but several factors are constraining attractive deal flow. Private equity firms like Thoma Bravo, Vista, and Francisco Partners now actively target VMS companies. Sellers have become increasingly sophisticated about their strategic value.

I found it particularly telling that on a recent podcast featuring Speedwell Research and a former Volaris executive, it was mentioned that some VMS founders are now attempting to push up acquisition prices by highlighting AI tool integrations within their products, even if the impact is marginal. This is exactly the kind of seller sophistication that erodes buyer advantages.

Average deal multiples have increased from 1-2x revenue in the 2010-2015 period to 2-3x revenue or more today (Sources: 🔗 Parkergale Capital and 🔗 SaaS Rise). While CSU has been able to maintain discipline and scale up, the math could start working against them.

The Mathematics of Large-Scale Capital Deployment

At CSU's current scale (~$70B market cap), maintaining historical returns faces mathematical headwinds that are difficult to ignore. To move the needle, CSU needs to deploy $2-4B annually. But there are fewer deals >$500M available in the VMS space, and managing hundreds of business units creates operational challenges that didn't exist when they were smaller.

This is where the "Constellationization" of software M&A becomes problematic. Multiple public and private acquirers are attempting similar playbooks, creating auction dynamics that drive up prices and reduce returns. There's also increasing scarcity of experienced VMS operators, though CSU has built a deep talent pool over the years.

Strategy Evolution: Adapting to Reality

Mark Leonard is acutely aware of these challenges, and their strategy is already evolving.

Let’s Spin Them Out

The spinning out of entities like Topicus and Lumine serves two purposes: it creates smaller, more agile parent companies that can hunt for smaller deals without being burdened by the parent's enormous capital base, and it provides separate currencies for acquisitions.

This is CSU's most effective tool for combating scale, and I expect to see more of it. However, it solves the problem for the spin-off more than for the parent. CSU still retains large stakes but must find ways to deploy its own massive cash flows.

Using Debt or Raising Prices Paid

The company could use more debt as they’ve demonstrated the last few years (they've historically maintained a pristine balance sheet) or accept paying higher multiples. Both approaches would allow them to do larger or more deals, but they introduce either financial risk or mathematically lower IRRs on new investments. If they pay 8x EBITDA instead of 3-5x, the return profile inherently weakens.

Accepting Lower Returns at Higher Scale

The most realistic outcome? Management may have to implicitly lower its internal hurdle rates from 25% to, say, 15-20% to get deals done. This would allow them to pursue larger, more stable assets that don't offer the same explosive returns but can absorb more capital.